Feed status · checked 2026-07-24
Réseau maritime Corsica Ferries
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Ferry
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Corse, France.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Review the rule documentation for 'missing_required_field' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Missing required field (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.worth about +18 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every terminal. A field survey can start with the busiest terminals.Likely your team
18 of 18 terminals don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Populate trip_headsign to match the published sailing destination.Likely your export tool
5020 of 5020 trips have no headsign. Riders at the terminal can't tell which destination a sailing serves.
⏱ Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.worth about +15 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Review the rule documentation for 'missing_required_field' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every terminal. A field survey can start with the busiest terminals. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Populate trip_headsign to match the published sailing destination. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 159 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of terminals and 100% of trips. This measures published data, not whether terminals or vessels are physically usable.
- Fare information
- No fare information is published in the feed.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Ungraded capability read
Ferry data profile
A ferry-specific view of what this GTFS feed publishes. Schedule measurements use ferry routes and trips only; fare and realtime facts are labelled as whole-feed. Unknown values are not treated as no.
- Ferry service
- 61 routes · 5,015 trips
- Terminal structure
- 15 ferry boarding locations; no parent-station hierarchy is published.
- Terminal access
- Not applicable: no ferry boarding location is linked to a parent station, so stop_access is not permitted here.
- Published accessibility
- Unknown: none of the 15 ferry boarding locations publish wheelchair_boarding. 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 100% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (5,015 of 5,015). Unstated values remain unknown. This reports published values, not verified physical usability.
- Bicycles
- 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 100% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (5,015 of 5,015). Unstated values remain unknown.
- Cars
- Unknown: none of the 5,015 ferry trips publish cars_allowed.
- Fares
- Whole feed: no applied fare data is published. This is not evidence that ferry service is free.
- Realtime
- Whole feed: no GTFS-Realtime endpoints are configured in this scorecard.
Descriptive only. This profile does not change the grade or verify vessels, terminal facilities, vehicle carriage, fares, or accessibility in the real world. Field meanings follow the GTFS Schedule reference.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 136 instances (10 error, 126 warning, 0 informational).
Service data covers the next 159 days.
0% of terminals state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. Fare data is not published.
0% of terminals state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and terminals
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its terminals only.
Skip to route and terminal dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and terminals: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| Sète - Ajaccio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Sete - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Sete - Ile-Rousse | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Sete - Minorque | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Sete - Alcudia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ajaccio - Sète | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ajaccio - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ajaccio - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ajaccio - Golfo Aranci | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ajaccio - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Bastia - Livourne | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Bastia - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Bastia - Piombino | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Bastia - Savona | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Bastia - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Sete | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Ajaccio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Porto Vecchio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Propriano | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Torres - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Vecchio - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Vecchio - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Porto Vecchio - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ile-Rousse - Sete | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ile-Rousse - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ile-Rousse - Savona | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Ile-Rousse - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Propriano - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Propriano - Nice | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Propriano - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Livourne - Bastia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Livourne - Golfo Aranci | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Minorque - Sete | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Minorque - Alcudia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Minorque - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Nice - Bastia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Nice - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Nice - Porto Vecchio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Nice - Ile-Rousse | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Nice - Propriano | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Piombino - Bastia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Piombino - Golfo Aranci | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Alcudia - Sete | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Alcudia - Minorque | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Alcudia - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Golfo Aranci - Ajaccio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Golfo Aranci - Livourne | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Golfo Aranci - Piombino | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Golfo Aranci - Toulon | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Savona - Bastia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Savona - Ile-Rousse | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Ajaccio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Bastia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Porto Torres | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Porto Vecchio | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Ile-Rousse | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Propriano | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Minorque | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Alcudia | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
| Toulon - Golfo Aranci | Ferry | teal (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 18 terminals.
List every terminal
- Ajaccio
- Alcudia
- Bastia
- Civitavecchia
- Golfo Aranci
- Ile-Rousse
- Livourne
- Minorque
- Naples
- Nice
- Piombino
- Porto-Torres
- Porto-Vecchio
- PortoFerraio
- Propriano
- Savone
- Sete
- Toulon
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error10 instances
Missing required field (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'missing_required_field' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: missing_required_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning5020 instances
5020 of 5020 trips have no headsign.
Riders at the terminal can't tell which destination a sailing serves.
Fix: Populate trip_headsign to match the published sailing destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)
- Warning61 instances
Some route long names repeat the route's short name inside them.
Apps show both names together, so riders see the number twice, like '5 5 Downtown'.
Fix: Drop the short name from route_long_name and keep the long name descriptive, like 'Downtown via 5th Ave'. (One field per flagged route.)
Validator rule: route_long_name_contains_short_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning61 instances
Route short name too long (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'route_short_name_too_long' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: route_short_name_too_long · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning18 instances
18 of 18 terminals don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every terminal. A field survey can start with the busiest terminals. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning3 instances
Some terminals exist in the feed but no trip serves them.
Riders may go to a terminal where no vessel is scheduled to arrive.
Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
A file GTFS asks for (usually feed_info.txt) is missing.
feed_info.txt tells apps who publishes the feed and when it expires; without it nobody is warned before data goes stale.
Fix: Add feed_info.txt with publisher name, URL, language, and feed_start_date/feed_end_date. (One small file, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt is missing its start/end dates (the file itself is absent)
Apps and this scorecard can't warn anyone before the feed goes stale without stated validity dates.
Fix: Add feed_info.txt with feed_start_date and feed_end_date to your export. (Two fields, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: scorecard_missing_feed_info_dates · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
The feed contains no fare information.
Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.
Fix: Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead. (A small file for most flat-fare systems.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_fare_data · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of terminals and 100% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 1 validator error to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 159 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of terminals and 100% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every terminal and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every terminal and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Can riders use it?
Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.
- 756 of 5018 trips list fewer than two stops. A trip with one stop has no leg a rider can ride; trip planners can't route anyone on it, so the service effectively does not exist. Check your scheduling export: every trip should list each stop it calls at, in order, with times.
- 3 of 18 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.
These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 159 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 10 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 58 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 85 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 38 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/fr-pan-81996/2026-07-24.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-24. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.