← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-09

Pacific Transit

Based on the feed this agency publishes

83.7 / 100

unchanged since 2026-07-08

Ahead of 90% of all tracked agencies and 89% of small agencies. Operates in Washington.

Covers 207 daysAccessibility gapsFlexible serviceNo realtime feed

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.1, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 6 hours ago; last changed 14 days ago.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip (most small-agency fleets are 100% accessible, so this is often a single default).Likely your export tool

421 of 421 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ Often one default setting in your export.worth about +15 points

Agencies here usually clear this within about 1 week (based on 5 observed fixes).

Fix 02

Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead.

The feed contains no fare information. Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.

⏱ A small file for most flat-fare systems.worth about +15 points

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

12 of 49 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +6 points

Close the loop on each fix. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and let the next run verify it — the scorecard shows the fix; the agency publishes it.

  1. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip (most small-agency fleets are 100% accessible, so this is often a single default). · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness90.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 46 instances (0 error, 3 warning, 43 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 207 days.

Rider experience61.7 / 100

76% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (69% marked accessible, 6% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is not published.

Accessibility47.2 / 100

76% of stops state accessibility (69% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Over time

Overall score across the last 20 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-08.

2026-06-19: 83.72026-06-20: 83.72026-06-21: 83.72026-06-22: 83.72026-06-23: 83.72026-06-24: 83.72026-06-25: 83.72026-06-26: 83.72026-06-27: 83.72026-06-28: 83.72026-06-29: 83.72026-06-30: 83.72026-07-01: 83.72026-07-02: 83.72026-07-04: 83.72026-07-05: 83.72026-07-06: 83.72026-07-07: 83.72026-07-08: 83.72026-07-09: 83.7
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-06-1983.7 first check
2026-06-2083.7 no change
2026-06-2183.7 no change
2026-06-2283.7 no change
2026-06-2383.7 no change
2026-06-2483.7 no change
2026-06-2583.7 no change
2026-06-2683.7 no change
2026-06-2783.7 no change
2026-06-2883.7 no change
2026-06-2983.7 no change
2026-06-3083.7 no change
2026-07-0183.7 no change
2026-07-0283.7 no change
2026-07-0483.7 no change
2026-07-0583.7 no change
2026-07-0683.7 no change
2026-07-0783.7 no change
2026-07-0883.7 no change
2026-07-0983.7 no change

What changed since your last check

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-08.

Same feed file as 2026-07-08; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

Beyond the grade

Opportunities that do not change your grade today: fare detail, on-demand service, and deeper accessibility data.

NTD certification readiness Ready

Published at a public URL, valid, and current: the three things the NTD GTFS requirement asks of a feed all hold here. Only your own D-10 certification makes that official; this is a heads-up, not a determination.

Published Ready
Published at a public URL.
Valid Ready
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Ready
Service data covers the next 207 days.
agency_id matches your NTD ID Not checked yet
Setting your GTFS agency_id to your five-digit NTD ID is an optional way to line a feed up with its National Transit Database record. FTA links the two on your P-50 form, so it is not a required feed change. We don't have your NTD ID on file, so this is not checked yet.

In plain words: if you report to the federal transit database, you have to publish a working, up-to-date feed and confirm it once a year. This box is a heads-up on whether yours looks ready; it is not the official sign-off.

A readiness signal mapping this feed to the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement (Report Year 2023 onward: a public, valid, current feed, certified annually on the D-10). Aligning agency_id with your NTD ID lets the feed line up with your NTD record; the July 2025 final rule links the two on the P-50 form rather than requiring that feed change, and requires shapes.txt in the published GTFS: Full Reporters from Report Year 2025, and Reduced, Rural, and Tribal Reporters from Report Year 2026. Not an official determination; your certification is the official check.

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 76% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 207 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 76% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 207 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

A data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Each category shows this feed's score and the standards it relates to: the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement, the MobilityData grading scheme, and the Google Transit gate. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Your state runs a transit-data program that can help: WSDOT Transportation Data. WSDOT builds and publishes GTFS for Washington transit agencies. Your state publishes no quality rubric of its own, so the closest published bars a program can hold this feed to are the federal and industry ones below; the score maps to those.

Correctness 90 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading: stop locations, route names and colors. Google Transit: a feed must pass validation to stay in Maps.
Freshness 100 / 100
The FTA National Transit Database expectation of a valid, current feed. Google Transit: an expired calendar drops the agency from Maps.
Rider experience 62 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading: stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a live badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates daily and links back to this scorecard.

Pacific Transit GTFS data quality grade: B

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/pacific-transit/2026-07-09.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-09. Use it in a board packet, an NTD narrative, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.