← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Hirado City Fureai Bus (平戸市ふれあいバス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

81.8 / 100

unchanged since 2026-07-18

Catalogued in Nagasaki, Japan.

Covers 73 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Hirado City's Fureai Bus community network (ふれあいバス); counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 6 hours ago; last changed 6 hours ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

197 of 197 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

58 of 58 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 73 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness87.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 4 kinds of issue across 1570 instances (0 error, 1568 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 73 days.

Rider experience60.0 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt and levels.txt.

    Consider: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and elevators, and levels.txt for each floor, so the step-free route is described.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 生月・中部線 (green)
  • 獅子線 (green)
  • 紐差・宮の浦線 (green)
  • 飯良線 (green)
  • 堤・前津吉線 (green)
  • 木ヶ津・大川原循環線 (green)
  • 宝亀スクールバス (green)
  • 大川原スクールバス (green)
Routes in Hirado City Fureai Bus (平戸市ふれあいバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
生月・中部線Busgreen
獅子線Busgreen
紐差・宮の浦線Busgreen
飯良線Busgreen
堤・前津吉線Busgreen
木ヶ津・大川原循環線Busgreen
宝亀スクールバスBusgreen
大川原スクールバスBusgreen

This feed has 197 stops.

List every stop
  • 紐差
  • 小牟田
  • 開拓前
  • 開拓前
  • 神上
  • 神上
  • 中田
  • 中田
  • 小牟田
  • 小牟田
  • ふれあいセンター入口
  • ふれあいセンター入口
  • 中部中学校前
  • 中部中学校前
  • 石原田
  • 石原田
  • 市民病院前
  • 市民病院前
  • 後口
  • 後口
  • 上中津良南口
  • 上中津良南口
  • 上中津良公会堂前
  • 上中津良公会堂前
  • 上中津良
  • 上中津良
  • 紐差
  • 紐差
  • 根獅子道
  • 上中津良消防署前
  • 上中津良消防署前
  • 若宮
  • 若宮
  • 神船
  • 神船
  • 岩谷神社入口
  • 岩谷神社入口
  • 津吉交流会館前
  • 津吉交流会館前
  • 津吉中央
  • 津吉中央
  • 中山
  • 中山
  • 鴨の首
  • 鴨の首
  • 平尾
  • 平尾
  • 志々伎児童館前
  • 志々伎児童館前
  • 根獅子道
  • 根獅子道
  • 草積
  • 志々伎
  • 志々伎
  • 船越
  • 船越
  • 向月
  • 向月
  • 飯田
  • 飯田
  • 野子
  • 野子
  • 福良
  • 福良
  • 野子学校前
  • 野子学校前
  • 宮の浦
  • 宮の浦
  • 松山
  • 松山
  • 草積
  • 草積
  • 平戸高校前
  • 根獅子公会堂前
  • 根獅子公会堂前
  • 美野坂
  • 美野坂
  • 飯良公会堂
  • 飯良公会堂
  • 飯良
  • 飯良
  • 宝亀浦
  • 宝亀浦
  • 赤松入口
  • 赤松入口
  • 紐差小学校
  • 紐差小学校
  • 赤松別道
  • 赤松別道
  • 大川原小学校
  • 大川原小学校
  • 布津原
  • 布津原
  • 平戸高校前
  • 平戸高校前
  • 下中津良
  • 鎌の首
  • 鎌の首
  • 北平
  • 北平
  • 木ヶ津
  • 木ヶ津
  • 武道館前
  • 武道館前
  • 坊主畑
  • 坊主畑
  • 木ヶ津教会
  • 木ヶ津教会
  • 雨久保
  • 雨久保
  • すずり
  • すずり
  • 大川原
  • 大川原
  • 大川原迎
  • 大川原迎
  • 下中津良
  • 下中津良
  • 南部中学校前
  • 堤小学校
  • 堤小学校
  • 西浜
  • 西浜
  • 井上入口
  • 井上入口
  • 猪渡谷
  • 猪渡谷
  • 新立
  • 新立
  • 多目的センター
  • 多目的センター
  • 津吉田崎
  • 津吉田崎
  • 津吉小学校
  • 津吉小学校
  • 南部中学校前
  • 南部中学校前
  • 津吉橋
  • 長泉寺
  • 長泉寺
  • 前津吉
  • 前津吉
  • 前津吉桟橋
  • 前津吉桟橋
  • 船木入口
  • 船木入口
  • 船木公会堂前
  • 船木公会堂前
  • 早福
  • 早福
  • 敷佐入口
  • 敷佐入口
  • 敷佐
  • 敷佐
  • 根獅子
  • 根獅子
  • 津吉橋
  • 津吉橋
  • 前津吉入口
  • 獅子道
  • 獅子道
  • 下馬込
  • 下馬込
  • 前津吉入口
  • 前津吉入口
  • 前津吉入口
  • 志々伎小学校前
  • 野手口
  • 野手口
  • 汐見町
  • 汐見町
  • 生月大橋公園前
  • 生月大橋公園前
  • 白石
  • 白石
  • 小春日
  • 小春日
  • 春日
  • 春日
  • 高越
  • 高越
  • 針木
  • 針木
  • 獅子
  • 獅子
  • 坂の角
  • 坂の角
  • 志々伎小学校前
  • 志々伎小学校前

Over time

Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.

2026-07-18: 81.82026-07-19: 81.8
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-07-1881.8 first check
2026-07-1981.8 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.

Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

7 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning1565 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning197 instances

    197 of 197 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning58 instances

    58 of 58 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning3 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt.

    Trip planners can't guide riders through the station, and there is no step-free route information for wheelchair users.

    Fix: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and any elevators, with a level for each. (Worth it for multi-level or large stations; flat stops don't need it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_station_no_pathways · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 73 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 73 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 87 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 60 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Hirado City Fureai Bus (平戸市ふれあいバス) GTFS data quality grade: B

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/hirado-city-fureai-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.