← Back to the full scorecard

Board packet · transit data quality · checked 2026-07-24

Réseau interurbain TXIK TXAK

Grade B · 81.4 / 100

First check for this agency, so there is no trend yet.

What this grade measures

The quality of the schedule data this agency publishes for trip-planning apps: whether riders using Google Maps, Apple Maps, or Transit see current, correct, and complete information. It measures the data feed, not service quality or operations.

Progress this period

No newly cleared items this period. The score and trend above reflect where the feed stands today.

What needs attention next

Three improvements, in priority order, each sized so the board can see what it is approving:

  1. Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead.

    The feed contains no fare information. Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.

    Estimated effort: A small file for most flat-fare systems.

  2. Check the flagged stops' shape_dist_traveled against the route shape, and re-generate it on export if they disagree.

    Some stops sit far from the route line, going by the feed's own distance values. Trip planners may draw the route down the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.

    Estimated effort: Usually an export-tool fix, not hand editing.

  3. Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE').

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase. ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Estimated effort: Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.

Produced by the GTFS Scorecard, an open-source data quality tool. A data-quality read to support the board conversation, not an official compliance determination. Live scorecard: https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/fr-pan-80701/. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.