Feed status · checked 2026-07-17
Transtejo Soflusa (TTSL)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Ferry
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Lisboa, Portugal.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Review the rule documentation for 'service_extends_far_in_the_future' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Service extends far in the future (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.
Review the rule documentation for 'service_window_outside_feed_period' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Service window outside feed period (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.
Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras.
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec. Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
⏱ A quick look at the flagged files.
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Review the rule documentation for 'service_extends_far_in_the_future' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Review the rule documentation for 'service_window_outside_feed_period' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 349 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 100% of terminals and 100% of trips. This measures published data, not whether terminals or vessels are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Ungraded capability read
Ferry data profile
A ferry-specific view of what this GTFS feed publishes. Schedule measurements use ferry routes and trips only; fare and realtime facts are labelled as whole-feed. Unknown values are not treated as no.
- Ferry service
- 5 routes · 938 trips
- Terminal structure
- 10 ferry boarding locations; no parent-station hierarchy is published.
- Terminal access
- Not applicable: no ferry boarding location is linked to a parent station, so stop_access is not permitted here.
- Published accessibility
- 100% of ferry boarding locations publish a value; 100% of all ferry boarding locations explicitly say allowed (10 of 10). Unstated values remain unknown. 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 100% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (938 of 938). Unstated values remain unknown. This reports published values, not verified physical usability.
- Bicycles
- 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 100% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (938 of 938). Unstated values remain unknown.
- Cars
- Unknown: none of the 938 ferry trips publish cars_allowed.
- Fares
- Whole feed: applied fare data is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime
- Whole feed: no GTFS-Realtime endpoints are configured in this scorecard.
Descriptive only. This profile does not change the grade or verify vessels, terminal facilities, vehicle carriage, fares, or accessibility in the real world. Field meanings follow the GTFS Schedule reference.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 4 kinds of issue across 67 instances (0 error, 0 warning, 67 informational).
Service data covers the next 349 days.
100% of terminals state wheelchair accessibility (100% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. Fare data is published.
100% of terminals state accessibility (100% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
2 accessibility depth signals
4 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (MT, SX, BR, TF).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
1 stop name(s) use abbreviations or symbols a screen reader may mispronounce, with no spoken form set ("Pedrouços/Algés").
Consider: Add tts_stop_name with the spoken form, e.g. 'Main Street and Second Avenue', for the affected stops.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and terminals
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; terminals are the dots.
Skip to route and terminal dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and terminals: this agency's GTFS feed.
- MT (red)
- SX (teal)
- CA (yellow)
- BR (teal)
- TF (orange)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| MT Montijo - Cais do Sodré | Ferry | red |
| SX Seixal - Cais do Sodré | Ferry | teal |
| CA Cacilhas - Cais do Sodré | Ferry | yellow |
| BR Barreiro - Terreiro do Paço | Ferry | teal |
| TF Trafaria - Porto Brandão - Belém - Algés | Ferry | orange |
This feed has 10 terminals.
List every terminal
- Porto Brandão
- Pedrouços/Algés
- Terreiro do Paço
- Barreiro
- Montijo
- Seixal
- Cais do Sodré
- Cacilhas
- Belém
- Trafaria
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
4 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Info28 instances
Service extends far in the future (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'service_extends_far_in_the_future' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: service_extends_far_in_the_future · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info28 instances
Service window outside feed period (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'service_window_outside_feed_period' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: service_window_outside_feed_period · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info10 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Unknown file (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'unknown_file' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Awarded
This feed earns the conformance mark: valid, current, and stating wheelchair access on nearly every terminal and trip.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 349 days.
- Accessible Met
- States wheelchair access on 100% of terminals and 100% of trips.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every terminal and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every terminal and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 898 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 97 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 100 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/transtejo-soflusa/2026-07-17.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-17. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.