<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>GTFS Scorecard: feed quality changes</title>
  <subtitle>Transit agencies whose GTFS data quality grade or score moved since their last check.</subtitle>
  <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:changes</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/changes/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/pulse/#changes"/>
  <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>GTFS Scorecard</name></author>
  <generator uri="https://gtfsscorecard.org">GTFS Scorecard</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Via Mobility: score rose 2.8 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/via-mobility-2395/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/via-mobility-2395/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_rise"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Via Mobility's GTFS data quality went from 62.2 (D) to 65.0 (D). A step in the right direction.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Towson Loop: grade improved D to C</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/towson-loop/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/towson-loop/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_rise"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Towson Loop's GTFS data quality went from 66.5 (D) to 70.9 (C). A step in the right direction.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Static feed for realtime: score fell 4.2 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/sandy-area-metro-sam-2739/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/sandy-area-metro-sam-2739/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Static feed for realtime's GTFS data quality went from 65.7 (D) to 61.5 (D). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT): grade dropped D to F</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/sacramento-regional-transit-sacrt/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/sacramento-regional-transit-sacrt/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT)'s GTFS data quality went from 60.0 (D) to 59.6 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT): grade dropped D to F</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/sacramento-regional-transit-sacrt-1296/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/sacramento-regional-transit-sacrt-1296/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT)'s GTFS data quality went from 60.0 (D) to 59.6 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rosemead Explorer: score fell 2.1 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/rosemead-explorer-3098/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/rosemead-explorer-3098/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Rosemead Explorer's GTFS data quality went from 57.2 (F) to 55.1 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RoadRUNNER Transit: score fell 2.1 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/roadrunner-transit-2075/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/roadrunner-transit-2075/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, RoadRUNNER Transit's GTFS data quality went from 55.7 (F) to 53.6 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pierce Transit: grade dropped B to C</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/pierce-transit/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/pierce-transit/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Pierce Transit's GTFS data quality went from 80.1 (B) to 79.7 (C). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Frederick County TransIT: score fell 6.3 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/frederick-county-transit-2432/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/frederick-county-transit-2432/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Frederick County TransIT's GTFS data quality went from 57.0 (F) to 50.7 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Durango Transit: score rose 1.7 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/durango-transit/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/durango-transit/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_rise"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Durango Transit's GTFS data quality went from 84.9 (B) to 86.6 (B). A step in the right direction.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clovis Transit: score fell 1.7 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/clovis-transit-2894/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/clovis-transit-2894/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Clovis Transit's GTFS data quality went from 72.7 (C) to 71.0 (C). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinton Municipal Transit Administration (Clinton MTA): grade dropped B to C</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/clinton-municipal-transit-administration-clinton-mta/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/clinton-municipal-transit-administration-clinton-mta/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Clinton Municipal Transit Administration (Clinton MTA)'s GTFS data quality went from 80.3 (B) to 79.9 (C). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinton Municipal Transit Administration (Clinton MTA): grade dropped B to C</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/clinton-municipal-transit-administration-clinton-mta-202/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/clinton-municipal-transit-administration-clinton-mta-202/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Clinton Municipal Transit Administration (Clinton MTA)'s GTFS data quality went from 80.3 (B) to 79.9 (C). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Static feed for realtime: score fell 1.5 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/clackco-connects-clackamas-county-2740/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/clackco-connects-clackamas-county-2740/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Static feed for realtime's GTFS data quality went from 67.2 (D) to 65.7 (D). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Jackson (JTRAN): grade dropped C to D</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/city-of-jackson-jtran/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/city-of-jackson-jtran/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="grade_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, City of Jackson (JTRAN)'s GTFS data quality went from 71.1 (C) to 68.9 (D). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Arcadia Transit: score fell 2.2 points</title>
    <id>tag:gtfsscorecard.org,2026:agency/arcadia-transit-2243/2026-07-09</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gtfsscorecard.org/agency/arcadia-transit-2243/"/>
    <updated>2026-07-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="score_drop"/>
    <summary>On 2026-07-09, Arcadia Transit's GTFS data quality went from 59.3 (F) to 57.1 (F). Trip planners read the same feed, so a drop is worth a look.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
